Step 01
Students complete a working-style survey.
Students answer a short instrument about how they work, communicate, solve problems, and contribute. Designed to take under ten minutes.
Faculty Access · Beta
Cohort forms balanced student teams from your roster — then shows you how each team is configured to work, where they’re drifting, and where one student may be carrying the load.
Approved faculty can use Cohort free during our beta.
Why this exists
You assign the teams. You watch them. By week three, you can usually tell something’s off — a quiet drift, an uneven load, a student you suspect is carrying more than their share. By the time you can name it, the deadline is close enough that the team can’t recover. Cohort gives faculty a team-level view of fit, friction, and balance — without reducing students to personality labels or individual scores.
What faculty get
01
Upload your class roster. Cohort uses configuration fit — not personality types — to build teams that complement across strengths, working style, rhythm, and load.
02
Once teams are set, each gets a report: where they’re strong, where load may concentrate, and what to do about it.
03
Catch the team that’s drifting before the deadline gets close.
04
Office hours with Jessica and the Cohort team. Your feedback shapes what ships next.
How teams are formed
Before students start a project, Cohort helps instructors form teams from a short working-style survey — so groups are balanced for the work, not just based on who already knows each other or happens to sit nearby.
Step 01
Students answer a short instrument about how they work, communicate, solve problems, and contribute. Designed to take under ten minutes.
Step 02
Cohort maps each student’s working style — not personality types or skill labels, but patterns in how they tend to contribute, communicate, and coordinate.
Step 03
Cohort compares possible team configurations and recommends groups balanced across working styles, contribution patterns, and workload risk — not random assignment or self-selection.
Step 04
Every formation is a draft. Instructors can approve, swap, hold, or override suggested teams. Cohort shows how each change affects the balance, so final decisions stay in your hands.
Step 05 · ongoing
Once the project starts, brief team-level check-ins show whether the configuration is working as intended — and surface drift while there is still time to act.
How roles work Coming Fall 2026
Cohort doesn’t just form balanced teams — it gives every member a leadership role matched to their teamwork strengths. Five roles, five domains of ownership. Nobody is support staff.
Roles define how each member contributes to the team’s functioning — in addition to, not instead of, the project work. Teams of 3 and 4 keep full leadership coverage through combined roles.
Team Lead, Project Lead, and Quality Assurance Lead as above. The fourth role combines engagement with conflict resolution.
What your class will see
A Team Configuration Report for each project team — plus a pattern label that names what the configuration tells you.
One member is absorbing too much of the coordination burden. The team may perform well early, but pressure is concentrating around a single point.
What to do
Clarify ownership before the strongest contributor becomes the bottleneck.
Sample shown: The Tentpole Pattern. You’ll also see patterns like Parallel Play, Harmony, and Spark across your class.
Illustrative sample data. The numbers shown are a design example, not a real team’s results.
Getting started
Upload the roster.
Start with the students already enrolled in your course.
Invitations go out by email.
Each student receives a private link to a short behavioral survey. No apps, no QR codes.
Review the proposed teams.
Cohort forms balanced teams and assigns each member a leadership role. You stay in control of the final roster.
Teams hold their first meeting.
Members review, edit, and sign their pre-drafted charter together.
The work becomes visible.
Cohort flags early coordination risk and gives you a clearer place to begin the conversation.
Coming Fall 2026
Students who complete the Cohort process receive a named, shareable completion certificate recognizing the leadership responsibility they practiced — designed for LinkedIn, without turning teamwork into a personality label or a public score.
Early classroom use
Why this exists
Cohort is built by working professors and technologists who kept watching faculty assign team projects without a clear way to see what was happening inside those teams. By the time the issues surfaced — the load imbalance, the quiet drift, the disengaged member — the deadline was too close.
Cohort is what they wished they had. A way to see how each team is configured, not just who’s on it. Where the load is concentrating. Where coordination is breaking down. Whether the pattern of work is set up to actually deliver.
Faculty Access applications are reviewed by the Cohort team. If you teach team-based courses, we’d like to hear from you.
Approval process
Applications are reviewed by the Cohort team. Most qualified faculty hear back within a few days. If you’re approved, we’ll send a short onboarding call link to get your class wired up.
Apply
FAQ
Free for approved faculty during our beta.
Faculty teaching team-based courses at accredited colleges and universities.
About 15 minutes to onboard a class. Students complete a 10-minute assessment on their own time.
Cohort works mid-stream. You can configure existing teams or form new ones.
Not yet. Cohort is web-based and works alongside Canvas, Blackboard, or whatever you use. No IT setup required.
Individual responses stay private. You see team-level patterns only — never raw individual answers.
Classroom use of Cohort is typically treated like any other instructional tool, but your institution’s IRB office makes that determination — check with them.
No. The role is how they help the team run — the project work gets divided by the team in the first meeting, and everyone carries a share of the deliverable.
Teams can adjust in their charter conversation. The assignment is a starting point built from their survey, not a verdict.
Team composition, charter status, and early risk signals. You never see individual survey scores — and students never see numbers either. No scores, no rankings, anywhere.